I've asked quite a few people about their AGI definitions, and the main thing I can report is that there's very little agreement. The main buckets of definitions are something like the following, ranked from easiest to hardest: 1. Can do 80%+ of today's remote tasks 2. Can do 80%+ of today's remote jobs 3. Can do 80%+ of today's and future remote jobs 4. Can do 99%+ of today's and future remote jobs 5. Can do ~anything a human can do, without needing scaffolding It seems like the popularity of definition is relatively evenly split across those! But those are all massively different in difficulty: there's a huge leap from 1 to 2, 2 to 3, 3 to 4, and 4 to 5. Related questions here are: what counts as a task? I've asked a few people and seems like people have an upper limit of something that takes about a few hours, perhaps a day. Also, some people who feel we already have AGI tend to have a definition that's something like: 1. Smarter than most humans at Q&A 2. Can outperform most humans, when given the right scaffolding and examples Tl;dr: If you want to have less confusing conversations where you don't talk past people then: * Be aware that when other people say "AGI" there's a good chance they mean something different than you think they mean * When talking with people about AGI, clarify which definition you're using, and ask which one they're using.